I think the issue raised is clear - people don’t know where to find information and updates, and they don’t see an official source for that information that is up to date. That gap is being filled by unofficial sources
Your reply is that the active contributor unofficial sources are collecting the information and sharing it. That’s the point I think @asc9ybUnb3dmB7ZW is trying to make, that someone needs to be made an official source. I’ve been using logseq for years and I can echo what the other users are saying, I have no idea where to consistently find actual updates and information. The answer to that isn’t to give me a link now in a reply - it’s to overhaul the communication style of logseq as an organisation to make it easy to find information. Having one responsible person who has ownership of this, and the authority to improve things (instead of just active contributors popping up to give info when they see it’s asked for) is the way to do that . In the same way that sharing a screenshot of a logseq todo list in a forum thread is not the correct distribution channel for roadmap updates, because 1 in 100 of the people who want to see the roadmap will see that screenshot. People still end up at the Trello! see posts from 2022 here where people are wondering if it’s up to date or not: Is there a public roadmap for Logseq development? - #4 by mlanza
It shouldn’t take 2+ years to delete an out-of-date trello board. An official, authorised community manager would understand these issues and quickly solve the low-hanging-fruit, and Logseq will be much better off as a project for it