How to find all tasks under blocks tagged with project namespaces?

Hi there, i am new to advanced queries in Logseq.
I found your hint for queries in namespaces and tried to apply it to my own example, but get no results.

This is my example. I try to get a query that shows the two tasks in the sub-pages of the namespace.

This is my query. I only changed the String ā€œTODOā€ to ā€œLATERā€.
002

Can you give me an advice, what I am missing?
Thanks in advance.

This goes from relatively simple to relatively complex pretty fast.
First of :block/refs doesn’t get what you need.
Also you want the block on the page and not the parent of the block, though in this case that is the same, but if your task is under a parent block you won’t retrieve it.
Next getting a namespace is only 1 level deep, and here’s where the complexity comes from.
I’m going to assume you don’t want that to be static :face_with_hand_over_mouth:
So I use rules to create a recursive search to find all pages under project, no matter their dept.
Here’s the query I created:

#+BEGIN_QUERY
{:title "Find Sub-Tasks"
 :query [:find (pull ?b [*])
   :in $ %
   :where
     [?ns :block/name "project"]
     (check-ns ?ns ?p)
     [?b :block/page ?p]
     [?b :block/marker ?marker]
     [(contains? #{"LATER"} ?marker)]
 ]
 :rules [
   [(check-ns ?ns ?page)
     [?page :block/namespace ?ns]
   ]
   [(check-ns ?ns ?page)
     [?page :block/namespace ?t]
     (check-ns ?ns ?t)
   ]
 ]
}
#+END_QUERY
1 Like

Perfect! It works!
Now I really can draw the Power of Logseq for my purposes.
Thanks, mighty wizard.
I do not understand the magic yet, but can use it and am eager to learn more.

1 Like

When i put ā€œprojectā€ (or the final target string) in lowercase letters, it works as intentioned.
Next i’ll try to filter on tasks with priority ā€œAā€.
Maybe i can do it without help from a magician.

Dear Siferiax, I do not want to be greedy but could you extend your helpful Query so that it Filters Namespace + Tasks + Priority ā€œAā€
As a beginner i still struggle a little with learning datalog.

Yes. :block/name is always lowercase. I forgot to mention, I generally add that for clarity!
Pages have 2 names, one is lowercase and stored in the attribute :block/name and the other is their original name case stored in :block/original-name.
I generally use :block/name so we don’t have to think how exactly we wrote the name of a page :slight_smile:

For filtering priority we have the attribute :block/priority
So we will need to add the line: [?b :block/priority "A"] to the query.
Alternatively we can do this the same way as we did for the task itself.

[?b :block/priority ?prio]
[(contains? #{"A" "B"} ?prio)]

In this case finding both A and B priority tasks. Just to illustrate how you can use multiple values for the contains? function.

Complete query for clarity:

#+BEGIN_QUERY
{:title "Find Sub-Tasks"
 :query [:find (pull ?b [*])
   :in $ %
   :where
     [?ns :block/name "project"]
     (check-ns ?ns ?p)
     [?b :block/page ?p]
     [?b :block/marker ?marker]
     [(contains? #{"LATER"} ?marker)]
     [?b :block/priority ?prio]
     [(contains? #{"A"} ?prio)]
 ]
 :rules [
   [(check-ns ?ns ?page)
     [?page :block/namespace ?ns]
   ]
   [(check-ns ?ns ?page)
     [?page :block/namespace ?t]
     (check-ns ?ns ?t)
   ]
 ]
}
#+END_QUERY
1 Like

Hi there @Siferiax , many thanks for the solution… its nearly perfect.
If you allow one last question:
Sometimes i would also note some tasks in the root layer of a namespace (ā€œproject/ā€¦ā€).
Is it possible to include these tasks with priority into the query results?

Best regards, already a fan… :slight_smile:

Someone should develop a GPT based AI that can transform natural language queries into advanced logseq queries! I wonder if anyone is thinking about this?

1 Like

Hi there,
i already found the great Query-Builder-Tool from adxsoft

but couldn’t figure out how to build a recursive query for the namespaces like the one @Siferiax provided. Maybe its just a matter of time learning the nuances of datalog.
For now the hints from Siferiax provides a very powerful solution for project management in Logseq.

There seems to be another question/solution that tackles the problem of queries in hierarchies.

Yes, definitely!
Change [?b :block/page ?p] to:

(or
  [?b :block/page ?ns]
  [?b :block/page ?p]
)
1 Like

Yeah that solution does basically the same thing as my solution :wink:

Thanks mighty Query-Wizard! :smiley:

So this query you suggested works

#+BEGIN_QUERY
{:title "šŸ”Ø All projects"
  :query [:find (pull ?b [*])
          :where
          [?p :block/name "projects"]
          [?par :block/refs ?p]
          (or [?b :block/parent ?par]
     [?b :block/refs ?p])
          [?b :block/marker ?marker]
          [(contains? #{"TODO"} ?marker)]
  ]
:collapsed? true
}
#+END_QUERY

But now I’m trying the following as the inverse - i.e. find all todos that don’t have any project tags, but it’s finding no results (despite the fact that I’ve created some test todos without project tags). Any idea how I can fix this? Thanks very much in advance! :slight_smile:

#+BEGIN_QUERY
{:title "šŸ”Ø Inbox"
  :query [:find (pull ?b [*])
          :where
          [?p :block/name "projects"]
          [?par :block/refs ?p]
          (not (or [?b :block/parent ?par]
     [?b :block/refs ?p]))
          [?b :block/marker ?marker]
          [(contains? #{"TODO"} ?marker)]
  ]
:collapsed? false
}
#+END_QUERY

Check out this post:

(Sorry doing this from a hospital bed on my phone :rofl: but thought I could at least point you in the right direction)

Omg, you’re my savior - this works perfectly. For whatever reason you’re in the hospital - I hope you get well soon! :blush::blush:

1 Like

Thanks. Had emergency surgery, but I’m back home and recovering just fine.

This thread is so helpful! I would like to sort the output by project - right now it is sorted by date of journal entry.

I tried adding:

:result-transform (fn [result]
                                 (sort-by (fn [h]
                                                  (get h :block/name)) result))

With no change

It outputs blocks, not pages. So we need to first get the page.
(get h :block/name)
Needs to be (get-in h [:block/page :block/name])

1 Like