It means adequate knowledge, making its usage by its possessor:
- neither efficient
- giving thorough explanations
- nor performant
- giving quick replies
- but safe
- giving accurate answers
You know decently a language:
- neither when you have a rich vocabulary
- like an automatic translator
- nor when you sound fluent
- like an LLM
- but when you can be confident that you don’t communicate nonsense
- where both automatic translators and LLMs fail
- As of today, using a decent learning book is more reliable.
- where both automatic translators and LLMs fail
To put things in scale:
- reaching decent knowledge:
- as human
- starting from “zero”
- is estimated that it requires either:
- 2 years half-time effort
- 3 months full-time effort
The differences between Artificial and Biological Neural Networks is a random article that:
- despite being:
- somewhat biased
- somewhat outdated (inevitably)
- introduces a fair percentage of the differences
- without even touching the rest
- rightly says: “biological neurons have only provided an inspiration to their artificial counterparts”
The thing is that:
- we don’t have an adequate knowledge of how our brain works
- Even what we thought that we knew about how neurons work
- the many different types of them
- the inspiration behind artificial neural networks
- turns out increasingly inaccurate
- Even what we thought that we knew about how neurons work
- we can safely say that artificial neural networks:
- being statistical inference engines
- don’t approximate any biological mechanism
Sharing journals is not the same with sharing knowledge:
- Input can be served by journals.
- Output needs dedicated pages.
The need is:
- not to reinvent the tool
- but to develop its application in your particular conditions