- Please don’t open the same topic in multiple threads.
- If you insist that the topics are different enough, at least link to them, so as to avoid repetitions.
- From the way you describe the issue, it is obvious that you are still exploring it, identifying the difficulties, but still not suggesting a solid alternative.
- Logseq addresses many workflows, while you are experimenting with just one.
- The relationship between
philosophyanda video about philosophyis not on equal terms.- The video depends on philosophy, while philosophy doesn’t depend on the video.
- This is because they are different entities:
- Philosophy is a general concept.
- As such, it can participate in multiple graphs.
- While the video about philosophy is a specific instance of video.
- It can participate only in a few graphs where videos are meaningful.
- If I have a whole collection of videos on philosophy, should not link philosophy to each one of them.
- That would produce plenty of useless noise.
- Should rather tag them as members of that collection and link only the collection to philosophy.
- And even that link should be nothing more than a simple reference.
- Philosophy is a general concept.
- Peer relationships are among same entities:
- You can have peer relationships among videos.
- You can have peer relationships among concepts.
- But you cannot have peer relationships between a concept and a video.
- Forcing a one-directional reference into a full relationship causes at least as many problems as doing the inverse.
1 Like