It’s funny that a table praising Logseq is published as a Notion page ;). Maybe that should trigger some introspection?
As for the table itself, it’s strange to disregard plugins just because they’re plugins. Does anyone think that VSCode or Chrome or Firefox are worse than the alternatives just because a lot of their functionality depends on plugins/add-ons? If anything, shouldn’t the availability/quality of plugins count as an advantage?
Of course one should check whether the resulting functionality is good or not, but that wasn’t even considered here.
Finally, the data exchange format being a full point for Logseq just because it uses Markdown, without considering how dirty actually is its output, makes me think this needs a lot more of detail to be useful at all.