What are the biggest differences between Tana and Logeq?

[alex0]

@matic_lauko

As for PDF annotations and whiteboards, I think that that is better to be done using some dedicated app.

But then they wouldn’t be well integrated into Logseq, defeating the purpose of having all information in one place. Maybe you should play more with these features and see how well they are integrated with the outliner.

@matic_lauko

Do you think Logseq will get something similar, I don’t think it’s in the Roadmap.

It’s already in enhance-properties branch on GitHub. See:

Tienson Qin (@tiensonqin) on X

@matic_lauko

Why is Logseq beccoming more of an all-in-one

Because exchanging data between apps and make them work well together in general is hard.

@matic_lauko

it’s just that I think with that It’s stopping the development of innovative features that would allow for better knowledge management.

Logseq is FOSS and everyone can contribute. It has very general features that can be adapted to many different workflows. It has a powerful plugin platform plus user custom CSS and JS. When it comes to FOSS, it’s important to provide an actual platform users can experiment with, it will attract more contributors and make the project evolve much faster than any proprietary product with only a team working on it.