Any idea what happened to Loam, the Foam fork working on Logseq compability?

There used to be a fork which promised to be compatibel: Loam - Visual Studio Marketplace

But the repo is gone/private

any idea why and where to find the last state?

The latest state I found (note: this looks older than the version of vscode, but the repo linked there seems deleted) can be found here: logfoam/README.md at master · DonnerWolfBach/logfoam · GitHub

I’m really considering expanding on that work because having two ways (one feature complete via logseq, one fast and convenient via the foam-fork from vscode) would fix a lot of my issues I think

Hey there! I was the developer of loam. I stopped working on it a couple years ago because I switched to Silverbullet for my notes. But I recently switched back to Logseq, which is why I saw your post here.

Sorry about taking the code down; I decided I didn’t like Github’s AI stuff, so I deleted all my repos on there. I went ahead and put the loam repo back, though, so if you want to get the latest version of the my code, feel free. I probably won’t work on loam further, but I’m excited to see any changes/improvements you make to it.

I’ll leave the code up here: https://github.com/CiceroIsBack/loam
(Discourse doesn’t let me post real links because my account is too new).

1 Like

Hi and thank you!

Figured it might be something like this since the vscode plugin was still online.

How are you experiencing logseq at the moment? Do you have a larger graph (>100MB)? Because for me the performance is so horrible that I decided switching away. See also my comments on Leaving Logseq - Alternative suggestions? - #4 by asc9ybUnb3dmB7ZW