That’s where I’m getting at, indeed. It just seems to me that having a standardized reference syntax is the biggest thing that’s missing for Logseq to get there.
I know, I’m in the Tana beta . And obviously I love that aspect of the tool, but the always-online aspect is more of a bother than I thought and I’m trying to figure out if Logseq could fill in most of my needs. (Logseq seems to be working on unified types too)