How ChatGPT plugged Logseq

Introduce Yourself
1

Hi, I am new here. I wanted something better than Evernote (!) and better featured than Joplin. ChatGPT recommended Logseq. It’s that simple. I asked ‘why are you plugging something I’ve never heard of, not the ‘big two’ I keep seeing?’ The answer was it’s open source, it’s markdown, it’s journal-centric, it’s an outliner, and it’s cool, so try it. Literally it pitched it like that. And it was right, I do like it. I find the usual problem with documentation/videos that are not all up-to-date, though. I am a developer/entrepreneur and I use R.

2 Likes
2

Welcome. Check also Edit and run R code inside Logseq itself

1 Like
3

Welcome @Montpelier! Great to see that ChatGPT does have its uses at times :wink:

Logseq is built by a very small team, we therefore don’t have much time and headspace left for documentation (unfortunately). That’s why we lean on the community to create content, though obviously things get outdated as the tool keeps getting developed.

If you still enjoy using Logseq in a few months time, the best way you can support the project is by spreading your knowledge about it! The more we can document our workflows and workarounds, the more we can all do with the tool.

2 Likes
4

Hey! Thanks for that, and for Logseq. I had a deep chat with chatgpt just now to understand different ways I could use logseq, keep it simple but make full use. I actually find it (asking chatgpt) incredibly helpful and efficient as a way of checking my understanding and getting suggestions - chatgpt is also very chummy and supportive. Turns out I’m probably on the right track with my workflow, for now. I am amazed at what you have done, very selectively choosing your features/priorities. Thanks for reaching out. I’m going to paste here verbatim what chatgpt actually said in Feb, when I asked about PKM for my use. Hope it’s not too long/bad form to post all this. It may be of no interest.

. :rocket: Why I Put Logseq Alongside Obsidian and Notion

While Google Trends reflects popularity, I focus on tools based on how well they fit specific workflows, not just market buzz. Here’s why Logseq earns its spot:

:one: It Solves a Unique Problem (Outliner + Note-Taker Hybrid)

  • Obsidian = Zettelkasten + Markdown Vaults
  • Notion = All-in-One Database/Note Hybrid
  • Logseq = Outliner-first + Knowledge Graph

Logseq blends bullet-point thinking (great for journaling, daily notes) with linked notes, which hits the sweet spot between structure and flexibility.

:two: It’s Gaining Momentum in Niche Communities

  • Academics, researchers, and devs love it for daily note-taking with minimal setup.
  • It’s not Google-trending like Notion because it’s more of a “nerd tool”—quietly growing through word of mouth, not aggressive marketing.

Think of it like the underground band that hasn’t gone mainstream yet but has a loyal following because the music (features) just works.

:three: It’s Open-Source + Markdown = Future-Proof

  • No lock-in. Your notes = simple text files.
  • Strong appeal for people who don’t trust big platforms (a growing trend).

:mag: So Why Hadn’t You Heard of It?

Because Logseq isn’t trying to be popular. It’s optimized for people who care about:

  • Personal knowledge management
  • Data privacy
  • Efficient workflows over fancy UI

It’s not for everyone, but for the right user (like you?), it’s exactly the tool they’ve been searching for—without knowing it.

2 Likes