maybe worth to list them , make them more visible , articles blog posts testing and comparing etc? (and fight for visibility , i.e. listing it next to mcp obsidian servers whenever they publish mcp obsidian server somewhere?)
I am not sure if existing Logseq MCP servers support datalog , referencing blocks etc to degree that LogSeq deserves?
Maybe we could have collaborative effort to collect requirements, functions, on high level semantic conceptual level, what operations person may want to do when
storing data in logseq
organising
retriving data from logseq
?
Having them later together compiled into requirements document may later be good input to generate some proposed MCP LogSeq server specification, that later can be used as checklist to compare implementations ?