Proposal: Changing How Namespaces Function in Logseq

I’m not sure if this has moved to triage by developers as it’s own feature or part of a different one, perhaps the tag approach for polyhierarchy mentioned in @gax’s feature request, link removed from quote as I’m new

Is there a more active topic where I can find more updated information/discussion on how others are using namespaces in their current state to meet flexible polyhierarchy needs by @alex0’s “virtual filetree” and how an eventual feature may appear?

I know there’s some continued discussion on meeting some of the needs of generic structure via queries on this discussion