Can anyone point me to a resource that explains why child 1.1 does not appear in the below query? It appears Logseq does not return a matching/hit child block if the parent block is also a match/hit - is that a bug or the expected behavior?
I’m unsure what causes this. This also happens when using an advanced query.
If we don’t use a table view, we can see that child 1.1 is retrieved, whereas a child without the property isn’t.