Everything you say is fair. Everyone has their own way of thinking. I have a boss who loves OneNote. I can’t stand it. I’m a structure guy. I don’t want the free form tabs, pics and colors. I prefer pages and structured data that can be arranged into outlines. Logseq suits my brain well, esp. the bidirectional links and the graphed nature of everything. It gets me close enough to my utopia even if I wish a few things were more to my liking. That’ll always be the case, for everyone.
Have you seen the feature requests? Insane. I certainly hope this doesn’t affect the core. I prefer the modular, opt-in software that results from a team emphasizing a plugin architecture. It lets you mold a tool to your liking without inheriting baggage.
At one point, being a developer, I was on a path to build the perfect tool, but once I contemplated the years of work I decide the many available tools were good enough. I stuck with Checkvist for a long time. I anticipate the same with Logseq. While Obsidian has some pluses (namely its emphasis on a plugin architecture) I just like Logseq better.