I also want the same thing: the ability to fully host a logseq instance (including the data/files) in the server. I’ve seen this discussed in several other threads [1][2] and also very confused as to why it’s not prioritized.
If you’re looking for an alternative, SilverBullet (silverbullet [dot] md) is basically exactly that, but with much fewer features than Logseq
[1] - Logseq in docker - ability to open directory on server · logseq/logseq · Discussion #7841 · GitHub
[2] - Local (on-server) storage for self-hosted Logseq